A West End renter thought she had finally found a two-bedroom unit within her budget on Montague Road last month. She booked an inspection, took a day off work, and drove across the city — only to find the property bore no resemblance to the photos in the listing. The images, it turned out, had been pulled from a separate property listed eighteen months earlier in Kangaroo Point. She was not alone.
Across South East Queensland, community groups, tenants' advocates, and first-home buyers are raising alarms about the re-use of property photographs across multiple listings — a practice that distorts what prospective tenants and buyers think they're getting before they ever set foot through a door. The issue has sharpened in 2026 as the region absorbs tens of thousands of new residents migrating from New South Wales and Victoria, compressing rental vacancy rates and pushing up competition for every available property.
The Problem Hits Hardest in High-Turnover Suburbs
The Real Estate Institute of Queensland has, in previous reporting cycles, noted that SEQ rental listings have become increasingly digitised, with image libraries shared across agency management software platforms. That workflow creates conditions where photos from a previous tenancy — or an entirely different address — can be re-attached to a new listing without a second check. Residents in suburbs along the Logan and Ipswich development corridors say the problem is especially acute as new stock turns over quickly and agencies handling high volumes of listings rely on automated systems.
In Inala, a community support worker who helps newly arrived families find housing described walking clients through listings on Flores Street only to discover on arrival that the internal photographs showed a renovated kitchen that did not exist in the actual property. In Capalaba, a first-home buyer said she made an offer on a unit partly on the strength of photographs that, she later realised, showed a display suite rather than the specific apartment she was purchasing. Neither person wished to be named due to concern about their ongoing dealings with agents.
Logan City Council's tenancy support services and the Tenants Queensland organisation — which operates a free advice line at 1300 744 263 — have both seen an uptick in enquiries related to misrepresented listing images since the start of 2026, according to publicly available service updates on their respective websites. Tenants Queensland has previously published guidance noting that under Queensland's Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008, material misrepresentation in a rental listing can form the basis of a formal complaint to the Residential Tenancies Authority.
What Residents Are Being Told to Do
The Residential Tenancies Authority — based on Boundary Street in the Brisbane CBD — processes disputes between tenants and landlords and can accept applications related to misleading conduct. Filing a dispute costs nothing for tenants, and the RTA's online lodgement system is accessible around the clock. The agency processed more than 12,000 dispute applications in the 2024–25 financial year, according to its annual report published in October 2025.
For buyers rather than renters, the Queensland Office of Fair Trading handles complaints about misleading conduct by licensed real estate agents under the Property Occupations Act 2014. A formal complaint can be lodged online through the OFT's Smart Licence portal. Penalties for agents found to have engaged in misleading conduct can include licence conditions, fines, or in serious cases, licence cancellation.
Advocates say the practical first step is simple: before any inspection, ask the listing agent in writing to confirm that all photographs in the listing depict the specific property being advertised and were taken after the most recent vacancy. That creates a paper trail. Screenshot the listing before attending. If the property differs materially from what was shown, lodge a complaint immediately rather than waiting.
With Brisbane vacancy rates sitting well below two percent in most inner and middle-ring suburbs as of the June 2026 quarter — figures the Real Estate Institute of Queensland publishes quarterly — prospective renters feel they can't afford to push back. Advocates argue that is exactly why the rules need to be enforced, not just exist on paper.